đ 100 Published Articles of AI Health Uncut đ
100 articles might not sound like much. But for me and my readers, itâs a milestone worth celebrating. Some of these serious research piecesâand especially the fraud investigationsâdidnât come easy.
Itâs hard to believe itâs been almost two yearsâand 100 published articlesâsince I launched AI Health Uncut. Feels like I just hit âPublishâ on my first Substack post yesterday. What started as a hobby turned into something I genuinely love doing.
Publishing 100 articles means Iâve averaged about one per week. And as youâve probably noticed, many of those arenât casual takes. Theyâre typically hardcore investigations and heavy research pieces. I gather data, track sources, and conduct interviewsâall at once.
Time flies when youâre tearing down broken systems. Looking back, a lot has been accomplished, but thereâs still a mountain to climb.
I launched this newsletter with 3 goals:
1ď¸âŁ Address U.S. healthcare problems and offer solutions. To the extent possible.
2ď¸âŁ Deliver the brutal truth about healthcareâtechnology, AI, innovation, investments, fraudâbecause too many people are scared to.
3ď¸âŁ Offer value that my readers canât just pull from ChatGPT. (Which, by the way, is probably why ChatGPT is itching to train on my content. đ)
I hold other healthcare writers to the same high standards.
Letâs keep pushing.
I donât have sponsors. I donât have advertisers. I donât have bosses. Why? Because theyâre the silent killers of innovation. They suffocate creativity and drown out the raw, unfiltered mission of this newsletter: to address healthcare problems and offer solutions.
I write with no strings attachedâjust the brutal truth drawn from my experience and expertise.
Now, because I donât have sponsors or advertisers, I owe a massive debt of gratitude to my paid subscribers and especially the Founding Members. The Founding Members Club is an exclusive group of 16 right now, and I know every single one of their names. These folks arenât just supporting my work. Theyâre covering the tab for those who canât afford a paid subscriptionâlike students.
In fact, almost all my writing is now geared toward my paid subscribers (hundreds of them) and my Founding Members (16 of them). They put their money where their mouth is, and Iâm working toward producing high-quality, sometimes provocative, but always evidence-based research on healthcare AI and everything around it. That includes AI modeling, AI fine-tuning and testing, AI products for healthcare, investing, regulations, policy, fraud, and successesâtopics I talk about in more detail below.
I believe in fair compensation for every piece of work. So, to those whoâve stepped up as paid subscribers: thank you. đ If youâre not a paid subscriber yet and you want my relentless research and analyses to continue for another 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and more, consider joining the ranks:
Here is what Iâm offering:
For Paid Subscribers:
Full access to posts and archives
Post comments
Join the community
Subscriber-only chat
For Founding Members:
Everything above, plus:
Priority in direct messaging
Shaping future topics
A 45-minute 1-on-1 call with me
I will donate 5 paid subscriptions to those who cannot afford it
For free subscribers:
Occasional free posts (like this one đ)
Iâm proud to say that every single person getting my newsletter chose to subscribe. And if they ever want out, they can unsubscribe with a single click. Thatâs how it should beâno tricks, no spam.
On August 27, 2023, I set out to publish bi-weekly (once every two weeks). Turns out, I ended up publishing weekly. Some people churn out content several times a week. Honestly, I have no clue how they pull it off. For the high-quality research I aim for, I need timeâdays, weeks, months even. Take my Babylon Health fraud investigation, or the exposĂŠ on UnitedHealthâs and Semlerâs flawed QuantaFlo deviceâa mess that turned out to be not just a financial scheme but one that physically harmed patients.. That took months to unravel.
Over this past two years, weâve done a lot. AI model reviews, fraud investigations, countless digital health industry deep dives, navigating new policies from CMS and the regulators, exposing private equity and venture capital scams, and doing multiple interviews. I also published an academic paper on best practices for implementing AI in clinical settings and have done several speaking engagementsâlargely thanks to my Substack and your support.
To be honest, when I started writing 100 articles ago, I didnât expect such an overwhelming response from so many people.
Hereâs just a small sample of some of the comments Iâve received.
Iâm flattered, and Iâm honored. Thank you! đ
I aim to instigate and to provoke discussion in every piece I write, often by playing devilâs advocate.
I donât give a damn about subscription trends. I donât obsess over them. If people find value in what Iâm offering, theyâll subscribe and spread the word. But wasting time on SEO optimization and all that crap? Thatâs not my game.
What I do care about is finding allies in my mission to address and offer solutions to U.S. healthcare problems.
I want to highlight the most crucial insights, hard-hitting analyses, and relentless investigations Iâve uncovered in these 100 Substack articles:
Best Practices and the New Hippocratic Oath
đľ I was upset that there wasnât a unified framework for best practices in clinical settings. So I did what any frustrated academic would doâI took matters into my own hands. I spent months buried in over 200 academic papers, survived the grueling peer review massacre, and finally published a paper on Best Practices of AI in Healthcare. If weâre serious about letting AI help U.S. healthcare, we need to make damn sure we do it ethically and responsibly. I break down the whole journey in this Substack article.
đľ Iâm proud to join some of my clinician colleagues in creating, and hopefully peer-review publishing, a new Hippocratic Oath for clinicians, specifically for the age of AI. Iâll be sharing details soon. Stay tunedâŚ
Healthcare AI Product Reviews and AI Model Critiques
đľ Iâve conducted critical reviews of state-of-the-art (SOTA) medical AI models, including Googleâs Med-PaLM 2 and Med-Gemini, and OpenAIâs o1 âStrawberry,â which was nowhere near ready for medical diagnostics despite the companyâs bold claims, as well as OpenAIâs gpt-oss, which wasnât suited for healthcare due to fine tuning issues and an overreliance on its HealthBench dataset.
đľ Iâve analyzed various Big Tech attempts to wander into the healthcare industry, such as OpenAIâs HealthBench project and Microsoft's so-called Medical Superintelligence healthcare AI agent project.
đľ I debunked a widely circulated JAMA article authored by over a dozen Stanford researchers that claimed AI outperformed human doctors. They made elementary, middle-school-level statistical mistakes to support those claims. Unfortunately, by the time I exposed the flaws, respected outlets like the New York Times and CNNâas well as renowned industry figures like Eric Topol, Bindu Reddy, and Elon Muskâhad already picked up the clickbait and run with it. That was quite a debacle. đ
đľ Iâve identified 10 obstacles the healthcare industry must overcome if we want physicians to trust and adopt AI in medicine.
Unmasking Digital Health Failures
đľ Over these two years, Iâve uncovered nearly 50 recent digital health failures, and the common themes are glaring. These arenât just mistakesâtheyâre wake-up calls. If we want to avoid screwing up the future of healthcare for our kids, itâs time to take a hard look and learn from these colossal disasters.
đľ Iâve exposed the following perpetrators. This is just a selected list: Babylon, VillageMD, Walgreens, Oak Street (this one started as a LinkedIn post but set off a firestorm in the comments), Olive AI, Teladoc, Livongo, Amwell, Summa Health, Cigna, Oscar Health, Clover Health, Optumâs Telehealth, Optum Ventures, Walmart Health, Cue Health, Truepill, Pieces Technologies, IBM Watson Health, Epic, Suki, Infermedica, Sniffle, Isabel, MayaMD, Klick Labs, Hippocratic AI.
đľ In particular, Iâve dissected the corpses of digital health failures and extracted some cold, hard truths: the death of Olive AI, the Teladoc-Livongo debacleâa masterclass in vaporizing wealth, transferring billions from Teladocâs retail investors to 7wireVentures and other VCs. The final nail in the coffin for telehealth as we know it, highlighted by Optumâs telehealth disaster and Amwellâs slow death spiral. Oscar Health and Clover Health are proving that insurance can still be a graveyard. Walmart Health? A Titanic that never left port. And letâs not forget Cue Healthâtaken out by a textbook illegal VC pump-and-dump scheme. Even Epic, the healthcare IT fortress, is vulnerable to Russian hackers. Welcome to the brutal reality of digital health.
đľ Iâve exposed 15 Health AI companies that have been lying about what their AI can do â including Suki, which recently raised $70M at a $0.5B valuation.
Investigating Healthcare Ponzi Schemes and Fraud, and Calling for Policy Implementation
đľ As a digital health founder, I dodged the SPAC attack when it was raining down on the industry a couple of years back. SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) was a glorified âblank checkâ Ponzi scheme, exploiting Covid chaos while the U.S. government had its back turned. The SEC eventually woke up, but not before the âSPAC Kingâ himself, Chamath Palihapitiya, cashed in and turned into an overnight billionaire by cheating retail investors out of their hard-earned savings.
đľ I spent months on my Babylon Health investigation, and what I found was staggering. 16 signs of potential fraud, 17 outright lies from Ali Parsa, Babylonâs CEO, and 22 hard lessons for the digital health industry. But the most jaw-dropping moment? In early 2022, CMS handed Babylon a check for $1B(!)âmoney that U.S. taxpayers entrusted them with! Why? Because some slick salesman named Ali Parsaâwho had barely set foot in the U.S.âconvinced them it was a good ideaâbefore Babylon had even done anything. The CMS $1B check was an advance!
And of course, after running multiple companies into the groundâthere was Circle Health before Babylonâthis guy has the nerve to launch yet another AI health startup, this time called Quadrivia. And whoâs he pitching to? The very same VC firms whose LPs just watched him incinerate their money. But hey, why not? Itâs not VCsâ money anyway. Itâs someone elseâs money. So let the freak show keep going until the music finally stops.
đľ Speaking of Theranos, Babylon, and AI agents, I ran a deep investigation into a startup called Hippocratic AI (though âHypocritical AIâ might be more fitting đ) that has raked in a total of $278M from VCs. Just a few months ago, they closed a $141M funding round on the promise that someday theyâll build AI agents for medicine. Will they deliver? Who knows. But does it even matter? Not really, as long as the cash keeps flowing. The companyâs CEO, Munjal Shah, has reportedly faced seven lawsuits for fraud at his previous venture, Health IQ. (By now, my readers should know the pecking order in the Healthcare VC Mafia, where Shah is a Made Man (a Soldato) answering directly to the Godfather himself, Hemant Taneja.) But does this concern the VC bros? Not in the slightestâonce youâre in the mafia, youâre part of the âfamily.â In fact, Shah began raising funds for his new âmedical agenticâ startup before the bankruptcy trial for his last company even started!
When you hear, âWeâre building AI agents,â itâs probably just smoke and mirrors.
đľ Iâve been banging on the doors of Congress, targeting those who supposedly care about healthcare, to expose the predatory practices of private equity in the sector. And by the way, venture capital has jumped into the fray, too. Turns out, private equity has been playing a rigged game for decades, thanks to massive legal loopholes.
đľ Case in point: Hemant Taneja, CEO of General Catalyst, and The Godfather of the Healthcare VC Mafia. This guy pulls off a stunt right out of the Gordon Gekko handbookâbought a hospital he couldnât afford by borrowing a cool billion and dumping the debt onto the hospitalâs balance sheet. To pull off this magic trick, he created HATCo, a shell company hilariously claimed to stand for âHealth Assurance Transformation Corporationâ. But letâs be real. The name is likely a nod to Hemant Tanejaâs own initials. Itâs straight out of the playbook of those narcissistic S&L CEOs from the 1980s who loved plastering their initials on their companiesâ market trading tickers, much like a certain president. đ
In my public comment to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Department of Justice (DOJ), and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) about Consolidation in Health Care, I argue that what Mr. Taneja and General Catalyst are doing is a Ponzi scheme. By creating a shell company to dodge potential bankruptcy inquiries and shoving all this debt onto someone elseâs books, theyâre playing a high-stakes game of financial Jenga.
After I wrote the original article about his slick Gordon Gekko-style leverage scheme, Taneja, of course, kept inventing new semi-legal schemes to stuff his own pockets. Enter âGC Wealth,â a founder extortion racket now valued at a whopping $2.3B. Taneja pitches it as a service for founders, entrepreneurs, and those whoâve âstruck it rich (or have the potential to)â in hot sectors like AI. But letâs be honestâthis is damage control disguised as diversification. With the firmâs fund performance floundering, long-term sustainability is in question. So instead of just burning LPsâ capital â their usual business model â theyâre now going after the personal fortunes of the very founders they fund. That, to me, is the textbook definition of a Ponzi scheme.
đľ Probably my biggest fraud investigation to date has been into a flawed PAD testing device called QuantaFlo, produced by Semler Scientific, a publicly traded company, and used by UnitedHealth. This device alone generates around $1B per year for UnitedHealth through upcoding profits, and it has actually caused physical harm to patients. In response to the DOJâs call, I submitted my public comment to regulations.gov (tracking number MB4-LOHP-8ZO1) detailing the harmful practices of UnitedHealth and Semler Scientific.
đľ Iâve also pulled back the curtain on healthcareâs most egregious oligopolies: Cignaâs CEO pocketing a cool $1B, UnitedHealth skimming $50B off Medicare with upcoding fraud, and Walgreens making the worst deal in its 123-year history with the VillageMD acquisition. And letâs not forget UnitedHealthâs AI, which managed to prioritize care for healthier white patients over sicker Black patients, screwing over 100 million lives in the process.
đľ Iâve also posed a provocative question to policymakers: Why the hell would doctors accept AI if, when an AI makes an error, doctors goto jail, engineers donât.
đľ One of my ongoing investigations drops in a few weeks. Itâs focused on a shadowy âdigital healthâ outfit called eMed, whose orbit keeps intersecting with names like Ali Parsa and Charlie Javice, with Javiceâs fraud sentencing set for next month in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. And then there is Linda Yaccarino, out as CEO at X/Twitter, whether by choice or push, and now at eMed as CEO as of two weeks ago. How does a company that burns $20â40M a year afford to pay Ms. Yaccarino millions? Beats me. The more I dig, the more eMed looks like a glossy front end for something strange happening offstage. đ¤ˇ
Exposing the Healthcare Mafia
đľ I built a detailed org chart of the Healthcare VC Mafia. Fascinating, and a bit terrifying.
đľ I also carefully mapped out Digital Healthâs Political Cartel. As I expected, in digital health, itâs not the most innovative who get funded. Itâs the most connected.
When Media Is In Bed With Venture Capital
đľ Iâve exposed how corporate media, especially Forbes, is in bed with VC bros and neglects the real problems in healthcare. Forbes seems more interested in promoting the biggest and most influential venture capital firms based on their brand names rather than their actual impact. I break down why Forbesâ VC rankings are fundamentally flawed.
đľ Some people pointed out, âWell, youâre so smart criticizing others. Why donât you offer your own?â And thatâs exactly what Iâm planning to doâoffer my own VC rankings based on their long-term success (well, mostly the lack of it đ) in digital health.
I keep hearing VCs scream during interviews and from the stages of overpriced conferences, âWe are here to invest in generational companies,â whatever the hell that means. Well, if youâre truly here to invest in generational companiesâand not just pump and dump the moment a secondary or an IPO presents itselfâthen letâs see what the data says.
Of course, we all kind of know the answer. But I still want the data to speak.
Fortunately, I support the largest dataset of publicly traded digital health companies.
Exposing VCsâ Dirty Tricks and Proposing Alternatives
đľ Iâve used data to explain here, here, here, and here how venture capital has destroyed digital healthânot just by burning tens of billions in LPsâ investments, but by leaving medical communities, customers, and founders in shambles.
đľ I explain why VC-backed companies are heading for the fewest U.S. IPOs in over a decade, especially in digital health. But I think you already know the reason. đ
đľ As an alternative, Iâve developed my own 21-point Health AI IPO Checklist. Itâs your ultimate guide to separating the unicorns from the roadkill in the digital health IPO parade.
AI Health Uncut: A Platform for Spreading the Word and Building a Thriving Healthtech Community
I'm eternally grateful to AI Health Uncut. It's been a gateway to incredible people, ambitious projects, and some of the most energizing conferences in our field.
Quick announcement: If you're looking for a provocative, no-filter speaker on the digital health industry or healthcare AI tools and models, DM me here on Substack or on LinkedIn. You wonât regret. đ
đľ Digital Health Inside Out is an engaging and provocative podcast I co-host with my friend and fellow digital health expert, Alex Koshykov. Our latest episode just dropped: âIs There a Science Behind Longevity?â
đľ On March 8, 2025, I had the honor of joining a panel at SXSW in Austin, TX, titled âMost AI Startups Are Doomed,â alongside distinguished co-panelists James Wang (Creative Ventures), Chidi Nwankpa (GlobalHealth AI), and Kartik Tiwari (Andromeda Surgical).
đľ I was humbled to be invited to join the board of directors of Health2Tech, an organization building health tech and health AI communities across the U.S. and around the world through educational events and conferences. From NYC, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Cleveland, Washington D.C., Miami, and Nashville to Tel Aviv â and expanding fast. I'm thrilled to work alongside true industry experts on this board: Alex Koshykov (founder), Bailey Morgan, Linda Alunkal, Audrey Guazzone, and Luca Caruso. If you're interested in helping organize a Health2Tech event in your city, or can provide space for one, please reach out.
đľ On September 11, 2025, I will be moderating the panel âGenAI in Healthcare: A Conversation with Foundation Model Buildersâ at the Prax AI x Healthcare Summit in NYC.
đľ In OctoberâNovember 2025, I will deliver a lecture series tentatively titled âPaging Dr. Watson: Why Healthcare AI Is 20 Years Behindâ at the European Humanities University (EHU) in Vilnius, Lithuania.
đľ On October 19â22, 2025, I will be attending HLTH USA in Las Vegas, NV â as an influencer, no less (donât ask đ). Use my discount code if youâd also like to attend, and save $250: âH25_POLEVIKOVâ.
đľ On October 23â24, 2025, Iâll likely be attending DC Startup & Tech Week in Washington, D.C.
đľ On October 28, 2025, I will be speaking at the Health AI Summit in Albuquerque, NM.
đľ In spring 2026, Iâll be in Warsaw, Poland teaching âAI & Economicsâ to the incoming class at the East European School of Political Studies (under the auspices of the Council of Europe).
đľ On June 8â9, 2026, I will be speaking at the Digital Health & AI Innovation Summit in Boston, MA.
đľ On June 15â18, 2026, Iâll likely be attending HLTH Europe in Amsterdam.
What My Subscribers Should Expect Next
đľ OK, so I just did a serious deep diveâpossibly the deepest in history đâinto the longevity industry. From gizmos and biomarkers to peptides, commercial products (yes, including AI), and the uncomfortable truth about why Americans are dying younger than the citizens of nearly every other developed nation. Itâs one of my spiciest pieces yet đśď¸. Andâdrumroll pleaseâthat particular piece marks my 100th published Substack article!
đľ Iâll continue digging into healthcare AI companies. (So if youâre working at one, watch out. đ) A few readers have asked, âWhy only cover the bad actors? Arenât there any good digital health companies?â Sure there are. And you can read about them in their press releases đ. But seriously, Iâll keep highlighting both the cautionary tales and the rare standouts actually doing meaningful work.
đľ As I mentioned earlier, Iâve got a packed schedule of speaking engagements lined up for fall, spring, and summer. Iâm building a body of work around a central theme: âPaging Dr. Watson: Why Healthcare AI Is 20 Years Behind.â It still blows my mind that industries like finance and manufacturing are two decades ahead of healthcare when it comes to AI. (Just last week, I saw a receptionist faxing insurance forms. đ¤ˇââď¸) Iâm unpacking the âwhy,â along with other themes and questions around healthcare AI, in over 100 slides.
đľ Iâll also be sharing my letter to Pam Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, and to Marty Makary, Commissioner of the FDA, detailing what Iâve uncovered in my investigation into Semlerâs flawed QuantaFlo PAD testing device, sponsored by UnitedHealth. Iâm sure the DOJ has already unearthed plenty of financial âirregularitiesâ (letâs just call it what it is: fraud). That part was kinda obvious. But I wonder if theyâve gone furtherâlooked into how much physical harm this dangerous device, still in use every hour of every day by UnitedHealth(!), has actually caused patients. Iâve got data on that, and I hope it helps both the DOJ and the FDA. We need to get this device out of our healthcare system once and for all. Lives are on the line.
đľ And of course, Iâm excited about the work weâre doing on a new Hippocratic Oath for the age of AI. Stay tuned...
See Something Unusual in Your Organization? Speak Up â Anonymously or Not
đľ If you want to share your storyâpositive or negativeâabout your organization, please reach out. Iâve reported on dozens of companies and conducted hundreds of interviews with insiders and former employees. Everything stays confidential until the day I die.
đľ Most importantly, if youâre being treated unfairly, bullied, or if youâve seen something suspiciousâwhether itâs about the product, finances, or accountingâdonât stay silent. Speak up. Every major media outlet has an anonymous tip line. And if youâd like to reach out to me directly, you can do so via DMs on Substack, LinkedIn, or X. Iâm fully independent, report to no one, and treat all information with absolute confidentiality.
Letâs Fix American Healthcare
đľ Iâve been pushing my readersâeveryone, reallyâto join me in fixing American healthcare. The system is a dumpster fire, and to extinguish it, we need your insights and your support. For example, I was able to expose so many problems and outright lies inside Hippocratic AI because people inside the company had the courage to speak up.
You canât fix what you donât understand, and right now, our healthcare system is a masterclass in dysfunction.
Weâve covered a lot of ground over these two years, but letâs be real: U.S. healthcare is still in deep sh*t. Until it isnât, we keep grinding.
Your comments and thoughts are the fuel that keeps this engine running. So, do you think my work with AI Health Uncut is moving the needle? What needs to be improved?
Iâm in this for the long haul, committed to fixing U.S. healthcare through AI and tech. Math, statistics, AI, and economics are my passion. But healthcare is my mission.
Hereâs to many more years of pushing the needle forward! đĽ Thanks for your support! đ
Acknowledgment: This article owes its clarity, polish, and sound judgement to the invaluable contributions of Rachel Tornheim.
đđđđđ Hi! My name is Sergei Polevikov. Iâm an AI researcher and a healthcare AI startup founder. In my newsletter âAI Health Uncutâ, I combine my knowledge of AI models with my unique skills in analyzing the financial health of digital health companies. Why âUncutâ? Because I never sugarcoat or filter the hard truth. I donât play games, I donât work for anyone, and therefore, with your support, I produce the most original, the most unbiased, the most unapologetic research in AI, innovation, and healthcare. Thank you for your support of my work. Youâre part of a vibrant community of healthcare AI enthusiasts! Your engagement matters. đđđđđ


























That is a lot of articles though! Congrats!
đĽ