HealthPrecision's Medical Brain: 98% Accurate or 100% Bullshit?
Another day. Another healthcare AI cheater.
Welcome to AI Health Uncut, a brutally honest newsletter on AI, innovation, and the state of the healthcare market. If you’d like to sign up to receive issues over email, you can do so here.
As you are well aware, these research and investigations are time- and labor-intensive. I’m a one-man operation. My Founding Members Club of (currently) 20 is what I heavily rely on for resources to conduct these kinds of thorough investigations. If you’d like to become a Founding Member of the AI Health Uncut community, you can join through this link. (Substack may ask you to enter your email first before taking you to the payment page.) You’ll be making a real impact, helping me continue to challenge the system and push for better outcomes in healthcare through AI, technology, policy, and beyond.
First, a quick reminder about a couple of events I’ll be attending in the next two weeks. I always look forward to meeting fellow healthcare AI enthusiasts, so if you’re at any of these, please DM me, or just say hello.
🔵 On October 19–21, 2025, I will be attending HLTH USA in Las Vegas, NV — as an influencer, no less (don’t ask 🙄). Use my discount code if you’d also like to attend, and save $250: “H25_POLEVIKOV”.
🔵 On October 28, 2025, I will be speaking at the Health AI Summit in Albuquerque, NM.
Is an “AI clinical assistant” really diagnosing patients with near-perfect accuracy and automating doctors’ work by 90+%?
HealthPrecision, the company behind Medical Brain, would have you believe so. They tout a 24/7 AI platform that monitors patients, spots risks early, and guides care in real time. On paper, it sounds like the holy grail of healthcare AI – a system claiming “98% accuracy” in its clinical recommendations and boasting that it can handle 92% of follow-up tasks automatically. They even claim their secret sauce is a “growing library of clinical modules” based on guidelines curated by “more than 50 full-time physicians.” Throw in some high-profile hospital partnerships and a supposed publication in a top journal, and it’s easy to get starry-eyed. But scratch the surface of these claims, and the shine quickly dulls.
Is Medical Brain a genuine breakthrough in clinical AI, or just another case of marketing over medicine?
I’ll explore the evidence – or lack thereof – behind the hype, with a brutally honest examination that separates the legit from the bullshit.
But before I begin, let me be clear. I have the utmost respect for the people working inside HealthPrecision. I know some of them personally. My criticism is directed entirely at the management’s false claims, not at the individuals doing the actual work.
TL;DR:
1. The 98% Accuracy Claim – Miracle or Bullshit? (Since I’m the one investigating this, I think you already know the answer.)
2. The Digital Health (Alleged) Fraud Never Dies — It Just Rebrands: From Circle Health to Babylon, From Health IQ to Hippocratic AI, and From medCPU to HealthPrecision
3. A Library of HealthPrecision Guidelines “Maintained by 50 Physicians” – Who Exactly is on This “Dream Team?”
4. Partnerships and PR: But Where’s the Independent Validation?
5. Is Medical Brain Just Repackaged Tech (a.k.a. “Old Wine in a New Bottle”)?
6. What Do Clinicians and Users Say about “Medical Brain?” (The Skepticism is Real)
7. Hype vs Reality: How Does Medical Brain Stack Up Against Other “AI Health” Tools?
8. Is Medical Brain an AI Tourist or a True Trailblazer? – The Final Verdict
